Two Pathways to Change: Comparing Neuro-Informed and Logoteleological Approaches

Introduction

There are many disciplines interested in human development and behavioral change. Among them, two influential frameworks have gained prominence: neuro-informed approaches, grounded in neuroscience, and logoteleological approaches, grounded in meaning-centered psychology. Each offers valuable insights into how change occurs and what sustains it. This article provides a balanced comparison of these models. It explores their core principles, mechanisms of action, and their potential to complement each other. Rather than presenting these perspectives as oppositional, the aim is to clarify how each contributes uniquely to the process of human growth and transformation.

Neuro-Informed Change: Repatterning Through the Brain

Neuroscience-informed practices are based on the understanding that the brain is malleable and plastic. Through the principle of neuroplasticity, repeated experiences can alter neural pathways. Practitioners utilize this knowledge to help individuals change their behavior by modifying their responses to internal and external stimuli.

Standard pathways to change techniques include:

- Cognitive reframing to alter thought patterns

- Mindfulness and grounding exercises to regulate the nervous system

- Habit replacement to build new neural routines

- Emotional salience to anchor learning experiences. These methods are often structured and measurable, offering practical strategies for clients to shift their behaviors and reactions gradually.

Logoteleological Change: Transforming Through Meaning

Logoteleology centers on the idea that meaningful, volitional change occurs when individuals align their actions with their authentic values and meaningful purpose. Rather than relying primarily on behavior modification, it seeks to clarify the internal meaning system that guides motivation.

The process includes examining:

- Attributions: The sources we assign as causes to events and behaviors

- Beliefs: What we hold to be intellectually true

- Values: What we consider ethical, guiding, and worth committing to

- Feelings: Sensory awareness and intuitive insight

- Attitudes: Our likes, dislikes, and priorities

- Aims: Our intentions and goals, based on what we mean to accomplish

Logoteleologists help clients gain 'meaning lucidity'—a state of accurate self-perception and contextual understanding—so they can act with intention and integrity.

Comparative Insights to Pathways to Change

This table highlights key differences and complementarities:

Dimension	Neuro-Informed Approach	Logoteleological Approach
Basis for Change	Neuroplasticity and reinforcement	Volitional realignment with meaning
Mechanism of Action	Repetition, reward, and regulation	Insight, reflection, and purposeful intent
Primary Focus	Behavior and emotional regulation	Identity, motivation, and meaning clarity
Role of Practitioner	Facilitator of structured interventions	Facilitator of discovery and realignment
Client’s Role	Active participant in exercises	Self-determined author of transformation
Goal	Functional Improvement	Meaningful, sustainable growth

Where the Models Intersect

Both models recognize the complexity of human behavior and the capacity for change. Neuroscience confirms that emotionally salient experiences create durable memory and learning. Logoteleology complements this by asking, 'What does the experience mean, and does it align with who I am or wish to become?'Rather than seeing behavior and meaning as separate, practitioners can leverage both, helping clients form healthier habits while also ensuring those habits serve their deeper values and meaningful purpose.

The Ethical Distinction: Conditioning vs. Meaningful Transformation

Conditioning, at its core, seeks to initiate or halt specific behaviors. It works by manipulating stimuli, consequences, or repeated exposure to achieve a desired behavioral outcome. This makes it a powerful but limited tool—it can create compliance, but not conviction. It can guide behavior, but not necessarily awaken meaningful purpose.

When change is guided only by conditioning mechanisms, it risks detaching action from volition. The individual may 'do the right thing' without ever knowing—or choosing—why. Conditioning can be indistinguishable from manipulation or propaganda without reference to a deeper, meaningful purpose or transcendent meaning, even if the behavioral outcome appears beneficial.

This raises a critical observation: many neuro-informed approaches, though not explicitly described as conditioning-based, fundamentally operate through similar mechanisms. While neuro-informed approaches rarely describe themselves as conditioning-based, they nonetheless rely on mechanisms, such as reinforcement, repetition, and cue-response learning, that are rooted in conditioning models. These tools can help shape behavior, but without anchoring in meaning, they risk producing compliance rather than conviction.

Logoteleology offers a contrasting paradigm. In this model, meaningful change does not begin with behavior; it starts with clarifying meaning. The individual is not a passive recipient of external cues, but an active participant in discovering what is true, accurate, and ethical, and worth committing to. Behavior change is not the goal—it is the natural outcome of a clarified identity and reclaimed purpose.

As such, Logoteleology views behavioral improvement not as an end in itself, but as a manifestation of meaningful, volitional living. Conditioning may shape behavior. Meaning shapes character.

A Thought Experiment

Consider two individuals addressing a fear of public speaking. One uses breathing techniques and positive visualization to reduce anxiety—gradually retraining the brain to associate safety with speaking. The other explores why the fear exists, what meanings were shaped by past experiences, and chooses to speak because it expresses something they deeply care about.

Both approaches lead to positive change. One emphasizes neural repatterning; the other, identity and volition. Together, they provide a more comprehensive path to transformation.

Viktor Frankl: “Man is not fully conditioned and determined but rather determines himself.”

B.F. Skinner: “We shouldn't teach great books; we should teach a love of reading.”

Conclusion

Neuro-informed and logoteleological approaches both offer powerful tools for facilitating change. One addresses the structure of behavior; the other, the substance of purpose. Integrating the two can produce not just change—but meaningful, enduring transformation.

The future of helping professions may lie not in choosing between these models, but in understanding how they converge—where the brain's adaptability meets the soul’s intent.

To Learn More

Please get in touch with us on how to become a Meaningful Purpose Practitioner.

Are you a positive and idealistic practitioner who yearns to make a profound difference in your practice, team, organization, and the lives of others? Despite your best intentions and efforts, do you find that certain hidden forces thwart meaningful change? Or perhaps you wish to be part of the solution by becoming a confident practitioner who helps improve lives. Where can you gain such confidence and the competence to achieve it?

Imagine a path that transcends surface-level solutions and taps into the core of transformation. Welcome to the world of Meaningful Purpose Psychology! This certification program will help you learn about the origins, concepts, and proven methods of this transformative approach.

Join our international cohort as we explore the tools that uncover barriers, lay the foundation for lasting change, and empower you to create a meaningful impact. Whether you’re a psychologist, coach, consultant, trainer, leader, human resources professional, or counselor, this program is your gateway to a meaningful and purpose-driven journey.

References:

• Frankl, V. E. (2006). Man’s search for meaning: An introduction to logotherapy (4th ed.). Beacon Press.

• Doidge, N. (2007). The brain that changes itself: Stories of personal triumph from the frontiers of brain science. Penguin.

• Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I. Q. (2015). Fundamentals of human neuropsychology (7th ed.). Worth Publishers.

• Marrero, L. A., & Persuitte, D. E. (2022). Meaningful purpose: A primer in logoteleology. iUniverse.

• Marrero, L. A. (2013). The path to a meaningful purpose: Psychological foundations of logoteleology. iUniverse.

• Sherwood, A. M., Rege, S. V., & Leiphart, J. W. (2023). Neuroplasticity. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557811/

• Pascual-Leone, A., Amedi, A., Fregni, F., & Merabet, L. B. (2010). Harnessing neuroplasticity: Modern approaches and clinical future. The International Journal of Neuroscience, 118(12), 1437–1444. https://doi.org/10.3109/00207450903526110

• Center for Respect. (n.d.). Viktor Frankl: Man’s search for meaning and survivors. https://www.centerforrespect.com/mans-search-for-meaning/

• Goodreads. (n.d.). “Man is not fully conditioned and determined…” Retrieved June 12, 2025, from https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/2029-man-is-not-fully-conditioned-and-determined-he-determines-himself

• Evans, R. I. (1968). B. F. Skinner: The man and his ideas. Eden Press.